Big Sky Country, mRNA & The Legislative Process
Will The Truth Be Heard ?
Two weeks ago I submitted written testimony to the Montana State Legislature on a bill that called for the ban of gene-based vaccines in the state of Montana. Montana is the first of many states to introduce this much needed legislation to protect the general public from the many harms that have resulted from widespread use of mRNA gene platform therapy in humans. While the human bill initially passed in committee it was later defeated on the house floor.
This past week, a second bill was introduced in the Montana state legislature that called for the ban of mRNA gene based vaccines in all animals, HB418.
I submitted written testimony in advance as well as oral testimony via Zoom on Thursday 2/20/25. The flowing are my written and oral testimonies followed by a followup letter sent to some members of the committee as a formal rebuttal to some of the inaccurate responses given by veterinarians in the Q&A session following public comment. Unfortunately, I was not given a chance to speak in the Q&A segment following the public comment period.
Oral Testimony: 2 minute time limit.
Mr. Chairman, members of the committee:
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address you today. My name is Dr. Brooke Miller and I have over 40 years of experience in Emergency and Family Medicine as well as a lifetime of experience as a cattle rancher. I am the immediate past president of the United States Cattlemen’s Association and a senior fellow with the Independent Medical Alliance.
I have submitted written testimony, and I encourage you to read that more thorough accounting of why I support HB418.
This experimental gene-based mRNA technology is not new. What we have learned over the past 4 years is that it is neither safe nor effective. My good friend, Dr. Robert Malone- credited with inventing this technology- abandoned it years ago because of these safety issues.
What we are seeing today in animal health comes right out of the playbook used by many of these same pharmaceutical companies during the Covid-19 pandemic. Their research studies are largely hidden from the public, yet they use special interest groups, industry lobbying organizations- many with financial conflicts of interests, and the media that depends on these pharmaceutical companies for advertising. They use all of these groups to flood our consciousness with propaganda that these so-called vaccines are safe and effective. They use fear and manipulation of science to create a perceived need for these gene-based therapies.
I ask you today not to succumb to fear but use your faith and show courage to stand up to all of the propaganda and do the right thing. Ban this dangerous technology in all animals and livestock.
The general public has seen the damages, and they reject this gene therapy technology. They do not want this in their food supply.
I ask you today to represent and protect the public. It is your moral and legislative duty. Vote ‘YES’ on HB418
Written Testimony:
Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee.
My name is Brooke Miller MD. I am a board-certified family physician with over 40 years of clinical experience in emergency and family medicine. I am a senior fellow of the independent Medical Alliance, as well as a former resident of the great state of Montana. I am a lifelong breeder of Angus cattle as well as a member and immediate past president of the United States Cattlemen’s Association. I am a husband, father of 4 and grandfather of 8 beautiful children. I love God, my country and humanity. It for these reasons that I address you today.
I adamantly support HB 418 to prohibit gene-based vaccine technology in Montana with the hope that other states will follow. The gene-based mRNA “vaccine” technology has proven dangerous causing a significant increase in all-cause mortality in every country that has widely adopted this technology.
The entire platform is inherently dangerous on many levels. The very inflammatory Lipid Nanoparticle that encases the protein antigen readily crosses all cell membranes and delivers this foreign protein to every organ system in the body. This is a major reason why we have seen such a broad range of adverse events and increase in deaths in recipients of the mRNA technology in humans. Other inherent flaws in this technology include that the mRNA is not natural but, is a modified mRNA that replaces uridine in the 4 nucleotide bases with N1-methylpseudouridine. This replacement “enhances stability” of the mod mRNA reducing degradation by the body’s innate immune system. Recent studies have demonstrated spike protein in C-19 vaccine recipients up to 745 days post vaccination. This fact alone explains the enormous number of side effects associated with this gene therapy technology. This inflammatory lipid nanoparticle carrier of a foreign antigenic protein travels throughout the body to every organ and persists for an indefinite length of time. This lays the groundwork for autoimmune diseases that wreak havoc on the recipients own immune system attacking any and all cells that display this foreign antigenic protein.
Ribosomal frame shifting is a very real phenomena that can and does occur, resulting in random protein production during the transcription of the modified mRNA. Most of these proteins have unknown properties and effects. Scientist, including Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier have linked these proteins to prion disease. May I remind you that prion disease is felt to be the causative agent in Jacob-Creutzfeldt disease.
DNA contamination. During the manufacturing process E. coli plasmids are used in the production of these modified mRNA amino acid sequences. It has been documented by multiple scientists that the vials of the Covid mRNA vaccines are contaminated with foreign plasmid DNA. Some of that DNA includes the SV-40 promoter sequence, a known carcinogen. Furthermore, this foreign DNA has been demonstrated in the bloodstream of individuals following injection with modified mRNA. The very real possibility exists that this DNA could integrate into the vaccine recipient’s genome.
Reverse transcription. In vitro studies have demonstrated that this modified mRNA can seat itself into the genome of human hepatocytes.
Informed consent- This technology has proven to affect others exposed to the vaccinated. Shedding of the mod mRNA as well as the spike protein has been shown to occur causing adverse reactions to others. This violates the sacred rule in human and veterinary medicine of informed consent. There is no known way to prevent shedding to other animals or humans that come in contact with and or consume mod mRNA treated animals.
Consumer acceptance. The general public across the world are rejecting this technology. I have seen the tremendous morbidity and mortality associated with this gene therapy. As a physician and cattle rancher, the number one question I get today from the general public: “Is there mRNA in our beef?” “How can I get or make sure my beef is mRNA free?” People are frightened by this technology, with its known and unknown potential harms. If the beef industry adopts gene-based vaccines it is sure to adversely affect not only consumer demand but export markets as well. Vaccinating livestock with gene-based technology will undoubtedly push the consumer to other protein sources that are inferior in both taste and nutritional value!
Opponents of this bill point to arguments that are highly suspect. We’ve heard slogans such as the “right to use a vaccine product” and “ranchers know what is best for their herds”. But do they? Have they been informed of all the adverse events associated with this technology? Have they recognized the rapid rise in all-cause mortality seen in this country immediately after vaccine mandates as well as in all foreign countries that have widely adopted this technology? Or have they fallen victim to the greatest psyop and propaganda campaign in world history?
During the Covid pandemic we have all seen and experienced the deceitful propaganda coming from the pharmaceutical industry, the regulatory agencies and the media. We all heard that if you take this vaccine it will remain in the injection site, and the body will metabolize it within days to weeks. All proven false. We’ve all seen media and health officials tell the public that this technology is SAFE AND EFFECTIVE! False. We’ve all seen health officials from the government regulatory agencies say, “If you take this vaccine, you will not get Covid, and you will not transmit Covid! FALSE! Why should we believe them now? There is a wise saying, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”
Right now we are seeing the same old tactics used in animal health that we experienced over the last 4 years on the human side. Create fear of an infectious disease, use allied industry organizations and the media to flood our consciousness with the safe and effective narrative. All the while hide any studies and clinical trials that have been performed.
THE REALITY: The pharmaceutical industry has a long history of fraud and deceit, manipulating study designs, ignoring safety signals and keeping their actual study data hidden from health officials and the public at large. They see the billions of dollars in fines that they have paid out over decades as the cost of doing business. To date no short or long-term studies have been produced for independent scientists to review. No consumer safety studies have been performed. No impact studies have been performed to assess the effects of this gene-based therapy on those exposed either by injection, shedding or consumption. But we are supposed to trust these large pharmaceutical companies that stand to make billions?
The alleged selling point with this experimental technology, the speed with which these gene-based vaccines can be developed for new and emerging threats is a trojan horse. In order to rapidly produce a gene-based vaccine in this time frame, safety studies must be skipped. This is a risk we cannot afford to take.
In summary, this gene-based technology contains synthetic modified RNA, encased in a synthetic lipid nanoparticle, with unlimited biodistribution for an indefinite time, causing acute/chronic inflammation and autoimmune stimulation, producing random proteins all while contaminating our bodies with foreign DNA (carcinogenic) that have the potential to integrate and forever change the genome of those injected as well as potential shedding and harming others. Produced by a process that will make billions for the pharmaceutical companies that have skipped long-term safety studies with hidden secrecy of the entire process using an experimental gene-based platform that has already proven disastrous in the largest human trial in history. What possibly could go wrong?
Following the public comment period, legislators then asked follow up questions to several people in the audience. From my perspective, these questions and to whom they were asked (and who they did not ask) was part of their strategy to build a case for their predetermined vote. I hope I am wrong.
Rebuttal to oral questions and answers for Montana HB 418 on 2/20/25
I am quite concerned with the accuracy of many of the answers and information given in response to questions asked by members of the Montana House Agricultural Committee with regards to the hearing on HB418.
Much of this testimony given by veterinarians in opposition of HB418 is exactly what I referred to in my oral testimony. The animal health division of these pharmaceutical companies are using the exact playbook we saw the human division use during the Covid19 pandemic. Create fear and confusion. Use allied health and industry groups to make false claims not backed by scientific data or research. Many of these groups that spread this information will have a bias or financial conflict of interest.
One veterinarian stated that the mRNA that is injected into the patient (in this case an animal) would remain in the injection site and be broken down within hours to days following injection. This is exactly what the public and physicians were told prior to EUA approval of the Covid-19 mRNA shots. This mRNA is not natural and is actually a modified mRNA with Methylpsudouridine inserted in place of Uridine in one of 4 nucleotide bases that make up mRNA. This enhances stability of the molecule and prevents the bodies immune system from metabolizing and breaking down the modified mRNA. Recent studies in humans have found the antigen coded for (Spike protein) in the C-19 mod mRNA injections over 700 days post injection.
It is a well-known fact that the mod mRNA does not stay at the injection site. It is encased in an inflammatory lipid nanoparticle that carries it throughout the body to every organ system including but not limited to the brain, heart, kidneys, ovaries, testes and blood vessels. This is a major reason we have seen such horrific and widespread serious adverse reactions that can occur in any organ system.
Other testimony given stated that the mRNA would not and could not alter the DNA of the injected animal. We do know that it has been demonstrated that mRNA can reverse transcriptase into human liver cells. We also know that multiple investigators have discovered foreign DNA in the vials of the C-19 mRNA vaccines included the carcinogenic SV-40 promoter sequence. This foreign DNA was recently demonstrated in the blood of C-19 vaccine recipients blood. This certainly could help explain the massive increase in aggressive cancers we have seen in all countries that have highly adopted the C-19 mRNA shots.
One person stated that the translation of the mRNA was highly accurate and precise resulting in known proteins. Again, this statement is not true. Ribosomal frame shifting can and does occur resulting in random proteins being produced with unknown properties. When the cell ribosomes translate the mRNA into proteins it is done in sequences of 3. Frame shifting occurs when a base pair may be skipped such as a skip in a bicycle chain. Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier has linked this to prion disease. (Mad Cow or Jakob Creutzfeldt disease.)
Furthermore one veterinarian stated that there are 5 current gene-based vaccines on the market approved for veterinary use. There is only one gene-based vaccine currently approved for use the USA for livestock. That would be Merck’s Sequivity mRNA genetic vaccine approved in swine. In order to use this vaccine, the user must sign a nondisclosure agreement. Highly irregular for something that is supposedly both safe and effective.
It was obvious to me that the veterinarians who testified were not familiar with the scientific data that has come out over these past 4 years. They repeated false talking points that were disproven long ago.
We also heard that we should trust the regulatory agencies to fully vet these gene-based vaccines. That certainly did not work with the human Covid 19 pandemic. Why should we put blind faith in our regulatory agencies when they have failed us multiple times in the past. Keep in mind that the regulatory agencies were some of the worst purveyors of false information over these past 4 years. They approved C-19 mRNA boosters based on the antibody response in 8 mice. No studies were ever done to test for the mRNA shots for prevention of disease or hospitalization although they were sold to the public on many occasions as being SAFE and EFFECTIVE. They now admit no such testing was ever done. The original Pfizer study showed that more people died in the vaccine arm of the trial than the placebo arm. Yet these deadly shots were approved!
To my knowledge Dr Christy Drivdahl-Smith and myself were the only persons to testify with any clinical knowledge and experience in seeing and treating patients that have been injected with or exposed to (shedding) these gene-based vaccines. It was very disappointing and concerning that neither of us was called upon to give our testimony in response to the questions asked and or the false statements given.
If the purpose of this hearing was to seek knowledge and truth regarding the true science and potential harms of gene-based vaccine technology that goal was not achieved. It appeared to me that the questions and to whom they were directed was intentional in order to justify a predetermined vote.